ABSTRACT
Background Sex differences exist not only in the efficacy but also in adverse event rates of many vaccines. Here we compared the safety of BNT162b2 vaccine administered off-label in female and male children younger than 5 years in Germany. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study, in which we performed a post-hoc analysis of a dataset collected through an authentication-based survey of individuals having registered children aged 0-<5 years for vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in six private practices and/or two lay person-initiated vaccination campaigns. We analyzed the safety profiles of the first 3 doses of 3-10g BNT162b2. Primary outcome was comparison in frequencies of 4 common post-vaccination symptom categories such as local, general, musculoskeletal symptoms and fever. Data were analyzed according to sex in bivariate analyses and regression models adjusting for age, weight, and dosage. Interaction between sex and BNT162b2 dosage was assessed. An active-comparator analysis was applied to compare post-vaccination symptoms after BNT162b2 versus non-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Results The dataset for the present analysis consisted of 7801 participants including 3842 females (49%) and 3977 males (51%) with an age of 3 years (median, interquartile: 2 years). Among individuals receiving 3g BNT162b2, no sex differences were noted, but after a first dose of 5 or 10g BNT162b2, local injection-site symptoms were more prevalent in girls compared to boys. In logistic regression, female sex was associated with higher odds of local symptoms, odds ratio (OR) of 1.33 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15-1.55, p<0.05) and general symptoms with OR 1.21 (95% CI: 1.01-1.44, p<0.05). Following non-BNT162b2 childhood vaccinations, female sex was associated with a lower odds of post-vaccination musculoskeletal symptoms (OR: 0.29, 95% CI: 0.11-0.82, p<0.05). An active comparator analysis between BNT162b2 and non-SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations revealed that female sex positively influenced the association between BNT162b2 vaccine type and musculoskeletal symptoms. Conclusions Sex differences exist in post-vaccination symptoms after BNT162b2 administration even in young children. These are of importance for the conception of approval studies, for post-vaccination monitoring and for future vaccination strategies. (German Clinical Trials Register ID: DRKS00028759).
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Fever , Musculoskeletal DiseasesABSTRACT
Background Despite the approval of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine for children aged 6 months to 4 years by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) in 2022, no data on vaccine effectiveness (VE) of BNT162b2 are available in this age group. We here report on the VE of BNT162b2 during an Omicron BA.1-2 dominant period. Methods An authentication-based retrospective survey was performed between April 14th 2022 and May 9th 2022 in individuals that had registered children for off-label SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in Germany. We used Cox regression to estimate relative VE of two BNT162b2 doses, with the period between first and second vaccine dose as reference period (24.8+-0.6 days) and >=7 days after Dose 2 to before Dose 3 as post-vaccination period (59.5+-23.6 days). Results The present analysis included 4615 children aged 2.8+-1.2 years (mean+-standard deviation) who had received their first dose of BNT162b2 on January 1st 2022 or thereafter. VE was substantial for protection from any SARS-CoV-2 infection (VE: 53.1% [95% confidence interval (CI): 36.3-69.6%], p<0.001), symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections (VE: 57.5% [95% CI: 40.8-74.2%], p<0.001), and SARS-CoV-2 infections leading to medication use (VE: 66.2% [95% CI: 43.7-88.7%], p<0.001). Differences in dosage of BNT162b2 yielded no change in VE. Conclusion This study offers a first industry-independent insight in the potential VE of two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine in children aged below 5 years, as currently only immunogenicity data by the manufacturer Pfizer/BioNTech are available. Limitations include the retrospective study design, and that the reported VE does not necessarily correspond to currently circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Severe Acute Respiratory SyndromeABSTRACT
Despite the need to generate valid and reliable estimates of protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe course of COVID-19 for the German population in summer 2022, there was a lack of systematically collected population-based data allowing for the assessment of the protection level in real-time. In the IMMUNEBRIDGE project, we harmonised data and biosamples for nine population-/hospital-based studies (total number of participants n=33,637) to provide estimates for protection levels against SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19 between June and November 2022. Based on evidence synthesis, we formed a combined endpoint of protection levels based on the number of self-reported infections/vaccinations in combination with nucleocapsid/spike antibody responses ("confirmed exposures"). Four confirmed exposures represented the highest protection level, and no exposure represented the lowest. Most participants were seropositive against the spike antigen; 37% of the participants [≥]79 years had less than four confirmed exposures (highest level of protection) and 5% less than three. In the subgroup of participants with comorbidities, 46-56% had less than four confirmed exposures. We found major heterogeneity across federal states, with 4%-28% of participants having less than three confirmed exposures. Using serological analyses, literature synthesis and infection dynamics during the survey period, we observed moderate to high levels of protection against severe COVID-19, whereas the protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection was low across all age groups. We found relevant protection gaps in the oldest age group and amongst individuals with comorbidities, indicating a need for additional protective measures in these groups.
Subject(s)
COVID-19ABSTRACT
Background The safety of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines is unknown in children aged <5 years. Here, we retrospectively evaluated the safety of BNT162b2 vaccine used off-label in children of this age group in Germany. Methods An investigator-initiated retrospective cohort study (CoVacU5) included parents or caregivers having children aged <5 years registered for SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in outpatient care facilities in Germany. Reported short-term safety data of 1-3 doses of 3-10ug BNT162b2 in children aged 0 to <60 months are presented. Co-primary outcomes were the frequencies of 11 categories of symptoms post-vaccination with bivariate analyses and regression models adjusting for age, sex, weight and height. On-label non-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines served as controls in an active-comparator design. Results The study included 7806 representing a 41% response rate of 19,000 registered children. 338 children received the first dose of BNT162b2 at age 0-<12 months, n=1272 at age 12-24 months and n=5629 at age [≥]24 to <60 months. A 10ug dosage was more frequently associated with injection-site symptoms compared to lower dosages. The probability of any symptoms (OR: 1.62 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.36-1.94]), injection-site, musculoskeletal, dermatological or otolaryngological symptom categories were modestly elevated after BNT12b2 compared to non-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, whereas the probabilities of general symptoms (OR: 0.74 [95% CI: 0.64-0.85]) and fever (OR: 0.43 [95% CI: 0.35-0.51]) were lower after BNT162b2. Symptoms requiring hospitalization (n=10) were reported only at BNT162b2 dosages higher than 3ug. Conclusions The symptoms reported after BNT162b2 administration were overall comparable to on-label non-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in this cohort of children aged <5 years.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , FeverABSTRACT
Background The COVID-19 pandemic has spurred large-scale, inter-institutional research efforts. To enable these efforts, the German Corona Consensus (GECCO) dataset has been developed previously as a harmonized, interoperable collection of the most relevant data elements for COVID-19-related patient research. As GECCO has been developed as a compact core dataset across all medical fields, the focused research within particular medical domains demanded the definition of extension modules that include those data elements that are most relevant to the research performed in these individual medical specialties. Main body We created GECCO extension modules for the immunization, pediatrics , and cardiology domains with respect to the pandemic requests. The data elements included in each of these modules were selected in a consensus-based process by working groups of medical experts from the respective specialty to ensure that the contents are aligned with the research needs of the specialty. The selected data elements were mapped to international standardized vocabularies and data exchange specifications were created using HL7 FHIR profiles on the appropriate resources. All steps were performed in close interdisciplinary collaboration between medical domain experts, medical information scientists and FHIR developers. The profiles and vocabulary mappings were syntactically and semantically validated in a two-stage process. In that way, we defined dataset specifications for a total number of 23 ( immunization ), 59 ( pediatrics ), and 50 ( cardiology ) data elements that augment the GECCO core dataset. We created and published implementation guides and example implementations as well as dataset annotations for each extension module. Conclusions We here present extension modules for the GECCO core dataset that contain data elements most relevant to COVID-19-related patient research in immunization, pediatrics and cardiology . These extension modules were defined in an interdisciplinary, iterative, consensus-based approach that may serve as a blueprint for the development of further dataset definitions and GECCO extension modules. The here developed GECCO extension modules provide a standardized and harmonized definition of specialty-related datasets that can help to enable inter-institutional and cross-country COVID-19 research in these specialties.
Subject(s)
COVID-19ABSTRACT
The German government initiated the Network University Medicine (NUM) in early 2020 to improve national research activities on the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. To this end, 36 German Academic Medical Centers started to collaborate on 13 projects, with the largest being the National Pandemic Cohort Network (NAPKON). The NAPKON’s goal is creating the most comprehensive Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) cohort in Germany. Within NAPKON, adult and pediatric patients are observed in three complementary cohort platforms (Cross-Sectoral, High-Resolution and Population-Based) from the initial infection until up to three years of follow-up. Study procedures comprise comprehensive clinical and imaging diagnostics, quality-of-life assessment, patient-reported outcomes and biosampling. The three cohort platforms build on four infrastructure core units (Interaction, Biosampling, Epidemiology, and Integration) and collaborations with NUM projects. Key components of the data capture, regulatory, and data privacy are based on the German Centre for Cardiovascular Research. By December 01, 2021, 34 university and 34 non-university hospitals have enrolled 4,241 patients with local data quality reviews performed on 2,812 (66%). 47% were female, the median age was 53 (IQR: 38-63)) and 3 pediatric cases were included. 30% of patients were hospitalized, 11% admitted to an intensive care unit, and 4% of patients deceased while enrolled. 7,143 visits with biosampling in 3,595 patients were conducted by November 29, 2021. In this overview article, we summarize NAPKON’s design, relevant milestones including first study population characteristics, and outline the potential of NAPKON for German and international research activities.Trial registration:· https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04768998· https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04747366· https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04679584
Subject(s)
COVID-19ABSTRACT
Background: Long-term health sequelae of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are a major public health concern. However, evidence on post-acute COVID-19 syndrome (post COVID-19) is still limited, particularly for children and adolescents. Utilizing comprehensive healthcare data on more than 45 percent of the German population from January 2019 through December 2020, we investigated post COVID-19 in children/adolescents and adults. Methods: From a total of 38 million individuals, we identified all patients with laboratory confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 through June 30, 2020. A control cohort was assigned using 1:5 exact matching on age, sex, and propensity score matching on prevalent medical conditions. COVID-19 and control cohorts were followed for incident morbidity outcomes documented at least three months after the date of COVID-19 diagnosis, which was used as the index date for both groups. Overall, 96 pre-defined outcomes were aggregated into 13 diagnosis/symptom complexes and three domains (physical health, mental health, physical/mental overlap domain). We used Poisson regression to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) with 95%-confidence intervals (95%-CI). Results: The study population included 157,134 individuals (11,950 children/adolescents and 145,184 adults) with confirmed COVID-19. COVID-19 and control cohort were well-balanced regarding covariates. For all health outcomes combined, incidence rates (IRs) in the COVID-19 cohort were significantly higher than those in the control cohort in both children/adolescents (IRR=1.30, 95%-CI=[1.25-1.35], IR COVID-19=436.91, IR Control=335.98) and adults (IRR=1.33, 95%-CI=[1.31-1.34], IR COVID-19=615.82, IR Control=464.15). The relative magnitude of increased documented morbidity was similar for the physical, mental, and physical/mental overlap domain. In the COVID-19 cohort, incidence rates were significantly higher in all 13 diagnosis/symptom complexes in adults and in ten diagnosis/symptom complexes in children/adolescents. IRR estimates were similar for the age groups 0-11 and 12-17. Incidence rates in children/adolescents were consistently lower than those in adults. Among the specific outcomes with the highest IRR and an incidence rate of at least 1/100 person-years in the COVID-19 cohort in children and adolescents were malaise/fatigue/exhaustion (IRR=2.28, 95%-CI=[1.71-3.06], IR COVID-19=12.58, IR Control=5.51), cough (IRR=1.74, 95%-CI=[1.48-2.04], IR COVID-19=36.56, IR Control=21.06), and throat/chest pain (IRR=1.72, 95%-CI=[1.39-2.12], IR COVID-19=20.01, IR Control=11.66). In adults, these included dysgeusia (IRR=6.69, 95%-CI=[5.88-7.60], IR COVID-19=12.42, IR Control=1.86), fever (IRR=3.33, 95%-CI=[3.01-3.68], IR COVID-19=11.53, IR Control=3.46), and dyspnea (IRR=2.88, 95%-CI=[2.74-3.02], IR COVID-19=43.91, IR Control=15.27). Conclusions: This large, matched cohort study indicates substantial new-onset post COVID-19 morbidity in pediatric and adult populations based on routine health care documentation. Further investigation is required to assess the persistence and long-term health impact of post COVID-19 conditions, especially in children and adolescents.